What the...

What the……..

Over the course of following the Kocis case we have heard the many opinions of many and the facts from a few.

When I first started following this case it was simple and was more of an open discussion with some people. We would actually discuss the details of the case. What we use to discuss was relevant to the case. Of course even with the discussion of the case some issues got heated, people got mad and upset. But when it was over, it was over. We moved on to something that mattered or some other topic dealing with this case.

I started this blog to keep my opinions posted, as people accused me of changing my story I could simply refer them to the blog and they could see I have not changed my story once. I still have the same thoughts and beliefs in this case now as I did the first day I started to follow the blogs about the case.

I am a firm believer that we are all entitled to the right of freedom of speech. But I’m to a point now that I don’t support the right of people to post their opinions just to be mean, nasty or just an outright jerk. Some of the comments have just flat out been stupid with no factual basis. Some even though this has been pointed out time and time again, still want to make up facts of this case to help them. What the…

Who is going to gain anything from following this case? No one other than Damon, he has claimed to have the book deal.

Why does anyone need to make up any fact in this case and post it? There are enough facts about this case that could be discussed without the lies being made up and posted.

It is mind boggling to say the least. If anyone wants to prove a point, actually use documented facts and prove what you have to say. The spoken word of a couple has become nothing. They actually mean absolutely nothing. That is sad.

It has got to point that I have removed a link from my blog and I ask a certain blogger to remove the link to my site from his blog and his response was, why would I do that?

Are you serious? It has got to the point that his blog and any word, spoken or written mean nothing to me and I don’t want to be associated with anyone like him. How hard would that be to remove my link from his site? Took me all of 30 seconds to delete him.

It’s almost as the famous blogger that we all have talked badly about. The “unspoken one” has (as it has been rumored) harassed people over links and caused problems for people over link to different blogs. He has made quite a name for himself.

Do we have another “unspoken one” in the making? This is funny to a certain degree. This blogger has claimed anyone that disagrees with him is suffering from a psychological problem. What does his recent action say about him?

I am a firm believer in the following;

We all know which blog supports which belief in this case.

Why in Gods name would you continuously post against what the blog owner believes?
Is it to make a name for you and obtain certain status on line? (I use to think there was only one blogger concerned about that, now we have several interested in the on line status issue.)
Is it to truly just be an ass?
Surely there has to be some reason to the continuous crap regarding this case.

During the time I looked at it as an open discussion and it was cool to be a part of. Now it has brought out the worst in me and personally no one is worth my time and effort here.
I will continue to post my blog as I see fit and will continue to post my opinions, thoughts and beliefs.

My blog was not started to publish anything or to become known in the internet world. My blog is truly my blog and it was started just for me. I personally don’t care if 1 person reads it or a thousand people read it, it is still my blog and a place for me to post what I believe.

As I have followed this case, I have been selective of the blogs I have read on a regular basis. This selection will become even stricter. I do know what blogs support which belief. If I decide I want to argue, rest assured I know what and where to post.

What happened to the day when we could actually discuss any topic of the case according to the actual facts of the case? It seems a couple has completely destroyed the possibility of discussion without arguments over lies and made up facts in the case.

It should be interesting over the course of time to see how the “unspoken one #2” responds. Honestly, I don’t care. I just don’t want to be associated with him in anyway. Unfortunately, he cannot even understand a fact as simple as I don’t want to be associated with him in anyway.

So I ask, what the…