Jim and Rob strikes again
It’s got to be true Jim and Rob said “see I told you so”…
First and foremost Rob has assumed that I get all my information from Elm.
Well Rob once again you are mistaken. I don’t know Elm and I have never once spoken with Elm.
We have emailed each other when I first started my blog but other than that we have never communicated other than posting on each others blog from time to time.
Get your facts right.
You want to make accusations and once again you only prove how stupid you truly are and how little you actually know.
I said I would print a retraction if any information in my blog was incorrect. That statement still stands today.
Jim, your typed words mean absolutely nothing to me.
Your word is not proof of anything.
Maybe you should look into the meaning of what I have posted, not what you think I posted. Of course this would actually require that you have facts and not your opinion.
When we did discussed the financial matters in the blogs my main point was how much money they made in a month.
Time and time again you avoided this question. They made a lot of money on a monthly basis. Of course you don’t want to look at the actual facts of this. You want to state an opinion to bring disbelief and discredit to anyone who supports Harlow.
They made a lot of money every month. No one can deny that. They had to make a lot of money to support the amount of debt they had.
I also pointed out that nothing had been repossessed prior to arrest. That is still a fact. Not opinion.
They may not have made timely payments but unlike Sean and Grant, they had money.
Did we ever see Harlow auction his used underwear prior to arrest to buy break fluid for his several cars? Not thinking so.
Of course you want to prove Harlow was infatuated with Sean and when the truth is know, Sean and Grant could not afford to travel to Virginia to meet them.
If you would read the discovery you would see the truth to this topic.
Of course, you will probably never see any part of that document.
You and Rob seem to be infatuated with each others opinions.
Again, if you have proof of anything is posted on my blog in error, please provide that proof. Just remember, your words mean nothing here.
I forget who said it, but to paraphrase the reason I don’t like Jim or Rob posting here is they post the truth to prove me wrong. Get a grip guys, you have no clue as to what the truth is in this case.
Let’s at least get this point straight. I don’t like scared people hiding behind a screen name. I have posted that time and time again. The only thing you can post is I’m scared of the truth. I want the truth; I just don’t want your delusional opinions.
Your opinions belong right there on Jim's Blog. This photo was on line and seemed to rank right up there with Jim and Rob on mtn. shitmore.
The title of the pic was a big pile of shit.
17 comments:
jim does need to separate himself from slob the clueless. so far, jim has not lied, nor do i think he will. slob on the other hand has done nothing but lie and break federal laws.
slob the clueless has no credibility. slob is simply a coward who ALWAYS fails to back up his claims. why? because they are ALL lies.
Talking about lies, BB, here are a few of yours:
(1) Sean was born 1985
(2) Sean's last name is not Lockhart
(3) Underage porn on BCO
(4) Underage webmaster on BCO
(5) Tax fraud by Sean and Grant
(6) Grant's fund doesn't exist
(7) Albert and DeWayne's relationship is not a romantic one
(8) Sean and Grant will be "dismantled" at the prelims
(9) Harlow signed a plea-deal
(10) Sean and Grant hired H&J
(11) Lie: "I refuse private conversations ..." versus Reality
BB
Has lied or has not lied, I dont care.
He is still a scared man hiding behind a computer screen.
Nothing more, nothing less.
He has made his typed words mean nothing to me.
Now of course as some claim he is Geoff....
I do know who and where he is.
"Did we ever see Harlow auction his used underwear prior to arrest to buy break fluid for his several cars? Not thinking so."
If you notice from my last post, Harlow's underwear got $0 in bids. So much for his delusions of grandeur about being a major player in the gay porn world!
"Let’s at least get this point straight. I don’t like scared people hiding behind a screen name. I have posted that time and time again."
Thus says "jakester."
jakester, your very wrong about jim. i do not defend him, do not misunderstand.
i know who jim is. he has remained true and faithful to his believes - many of which i disagree with - from day one.
i do not know care what jim thinks about me. i have respect for him coz he has never attacked me and is open to other opinions. - even though he eventually disagrees with most.
when he realizes he is wrong or mistaken, he acknowledges it.
clueless slob on the other hand, well he blew it when he impersonated a federal officer. a serious crime is that. the rest of his lies and claims are well documented.
Yeah, and I wanna echo what bb says...even though we RADICALLY disagree on certain issues, it's never got personal between us. We've been able to discuss, perhaps have heated back and forth, but never gotten down to name calling, such as "stupid," or made threats to "expose" people.
Something you might be able to learn from, jakester, once you reach the requisite level of personal maturity.
Jakester--
You contradicted yourself. You said you don't communicate with Elm TELEPHONICALLY; however, you do EXCHANGE EMAILS. I do know this fact--communication is communication in whatever medium; hence, you exchange information which means you both communicate with one another.
Next, I have been very clear. I do not believe Elm's accounts, and I use that word loosely, regarding Harlow and Joe. Neither, did the Pennsylvania State Police and, thus, the pair sit in jail awaiting trial on murder.
As for BB/Robert, Brynawel has it summed up nicely so I will quote her: "Talking about lies, BB, here are a few of yours:
(1) Sean was born 1985
(2) Sean's last name is not Lockhart
(3) Underage porn on BCO
(4) Underage webmaster on BCO
(5) Tax fraud by Sean and Grant
(6) Grant's [trust] fund doesn't exist
(7) Albert and DeWayne's relationship is not a romantic one
(8) Sean and Grant will be "dismantled" at the prelims
(9) Harlow signed a plea-deal
(10) Sean and Grant hired H&J
(11) Lie: "I refuse private conversations ..." versus Reality."
Since you brought it up on Elm's blog Robert, how did you communicate with Elm?
I find Jim as objective as anyone can be and like me, he will confront with facts and that makes Jim and I allies. I don't care for Jakester and his personal attacks that he is trying to pass off as fact.
As I understand it Robert, working for Kocis you broke plenty of federal laws. What did you say your alibi was? Does appear to be mighty relevant. Slinging mud doesn't cut it. Since before your boss got sliced and diced, you were attacking Sean and Grant. Anyone interested in this murder case would have to wonder why a failed medical school student turned BF and flunky for an underage teen male raping pervert with a primary duty to procure other underage teen males for 3-somes with said model and his boss and to vouch for questioned documents for 2257 forms and so function as cameraman for said raping pervert. Yep. You sure have a CV to be proud of.
Jakester is the king of Mt. Shitmore and has staked out a homestead on its peak.
slob how desperate you are. desperate you will remain. comes with being clueless.
the fact remains, you are a proven criminal and a proven liar. nothing will change those facts.
you built your huge fat file of bullshit - sleep in it. it is where you belong.
Robert--
The only criminal here is you. You attack anyone who points out your foibles. So much for your deflection of attention, a tactic you acquired from the "absent" but ever present Cadinot4ever the British barrister who tried to get Jason Sechrest to delete his "Anonymous" remarks which points to a less than noble motive.
You can attempt to undercut others but it does not and will not change the fact of the matter: You were up to your eyeballs in Kocis' criminal affairs as a fully participating partner and that is on the record.
slob, yest again you fail to provide proof of your claims, no surprise, they are lies.
your on your own, drowning in your own fat file of bullshit.
i see nobody of consequence rush to your aid. telling is that. must be the smell from your fat file :)
fact is your a proven liar and a proven criminal. now run along and tell your lies to someone who cares.
Rob,
just shut up....
Once again you have proved and posted that you know nothing at all.
You and Jim were made for each other.
Robert a little quote for your pal Cad and yourself to ponder: Jared wrote, "Cad said . . . How many people did Bryan hurt? August 1, 2007 @ 4:50 p.m." I have a better question. How many did he kill? August 6, 2007 @ 7:49 p.m. If Jared so thinks about your dead boss, well the implications are just staggering to you.
Robert you forgot Brynawel. For whatever reason, she doesn't seem to be on your side; hence, an ally.
King Jakester of Mt. Shitmore did you say something? You must be losing your argument. I know you for a factless shit for brains who would like to think that character assassination substitutes for your lack of facts. Nothing in the evidence available to date backs any premise that Harlow and Joe are blameless of this murder. Nothing. You want to make that case, produce credible evidence.
Like I wrote Nimrod, "You contradicted yourself. You said you don't communicate with Elm TELEPHONICALLY; however, you do EXCHANGE EMAILS. I do know this fact--communication is communication in whatever medium; hence, you exchange information which means you both communicate with one another." Your premise your majesty. You have any other pearls of stupidity to caste forth King Jakester?
Robert--
Jim writes, "Yeah, and I wanna echo what bb says...even though we RADICALLY disagree on certain issues . . . ." So much for UNQUALIFIED SUPPORT from Jim. Seems tepid at best.
criminal slob ROFLMAO.
you committed several crimes.
you have no credibility.
not once have i claimed i have allies or people on my side. it is something i do not require.
you on the other hand have made use of every blogger you know in lame attempts as a way of providing back-up to your well known lies.
impersonating a federal agent you were.
busted you were.
sad you are.
pathetic you are.
a bigger liar than elm you are.
Robert--
In so far as liars and gay deceivers go Robert you are well practiced.
You were in telephonic communication with Elm at one point and then BAM lightning strikes and you two had a falling out.
And then your pal Cad leaked a MOU and the Settlement Agreement and posted as Anonymous on Jason Curious' blog within two to three days of the murder of key discussions Kocis was having with Bergeron to keep Sean a virtual sex slave in an apartment with Sean becoming a sex commodity. Yeah, you are no angelic spirit by any stretch.
You started well. You stole college letterhead. Brynawel details the litany of your lies. Then you started procuring as Kocis' pimp. The only male whore I see here is you Robert and you are still one.
lying slob, clueless as always. i have never spoken with elm - dont have his number. dont want it.
you on the other hand were in constant contact via telephone with elm for months.
yet again you fail to answer the proven charges presented to you.
yep, your guilty on all counts. a proven criminal, a proven liar.
Post a Comment