The Scales of Justice

The Scales of Justice


Over the course of following this case one thing has become more and more apparent. Most have no regard for the rights of others and have convicted men accused of a crime without the right to a trial before making such an accusation.

Of course, I don’t know how active people are in following other cases or even if they follow other cases. It makes me wonder why some are so actually involved in following this case.

I find it amazing people claim they want to discuss the case and yet they don’t want to discuss any topic they happen to disagree with. It’s almost to the point of being comical. Ask a question about certain topics and they want to change the entire topic back to Harlow and Joe being guilty. Certain bloggers seem to become mad and angry with some of the response they post in regards to certain questions.

Over the course of this case, I have asked time and time again, who are you and what reason are you following this case? Time and time again there has been no response to any answer as to why some even follow this case.

I also find it amazing that people post comments on certain blogs when they know where the blog master stands in this case. If you know someone is supporting Harlow and Joe, why would you think they want all the comments about the guilt of Harlow and Joe posted on their blog? Are certain bloggers just trying to start some type of heated argument? Do they actually have some claim in this case? Are they involved in the case and trying to defend themselves?

These are all questions we will never know the answer to because as soon as you question certain topics, the entire response goes right back to Harlow and Joe are guilty. It almost seems some people have something to hide in regards to this case. Here is an example of what I am talking about (this is part of a post I made at another blog)

Jim just so you know this is from Caleb Carter, this is not from Harlow. Now explain to me how statements like this prove that Sean and Grant are exonerated in this case. I wonder why they deny making such a statement? I mean after all Jim you scream all the time they have been exonerated but here is a statement from someone not involved at all making a statement against poor ole Sean and Grant…

People can scream all they want that Harlow and Joe are guilty but no one can say Sean and Grant are involved in any way without a heated debate. I wonder what connection some may have with Sean and Grant? Why are some so hell bent on proving the innocence of a couple of guys we have read about?

Here is the response I got to the entry
Rob said...
Good luck!
The bloggers want hard facts, not the fantasy of a besoughted wanna be suitor.
Explain for us why Harlow and Joe torched the 2257 records and destroyed certain master discs and retained others. Felony Evidence tampering and obstruction of justice--2 counts, the home fire and destruction of master discs and other paper records (on the road). It is well known that the grifting duo viewed certain of the master discs, presumably not Cobra Video for the masses material, but private stock for the purpose of blackmail. Felony arson--wanton disregard for the lives and property of others.
Explain why they fled to avoid prosecution while using a third party who was in contact with Grant Roy in a feeble attempt to film the grifting duo's goal, a film deal with Sean. Felony abetting suspects in their flight to avoid prosecution. Felony: Accessory to murder after the fact. Felony coercion and extortion. Felony: Interference with official acts.
Once the grifting pair crossed interstate lines from PA back into VA and fled jurisdiction of the murder back to VA and from VA to FL, the matter became a Federal one. That is, Interstate Flight to Avoid Prosecution. A Federal All Points Bulletin was issued for the grifters, now murder suspects.
Everything here is chargeable within US Criminal Code. That means if PA blows it, well the boys are facing a truck full of Federal charges as well as anyone who abetted them.
Oh yeah. Harlow and Joe are so in this up to their eyeballs.
October 6, 2007 5:58 AM

The response of course did not cover one single issue I asked about but yet went right back to Harlow and Joe are guilty and failed to respond to any activity Sean and Grant may have had in this case.

They want the hard facts, well the Rolling Stone and Out article provided some hard facts about the attitude and behavior of Sean and Grant, but some have even taken those statement to try to provide proof that Sean and Grant have been exonerated in this case. The articles proved anything but being exonerated.

One thing for sure, the Scales of Justice will prevail in this case. There will be no hiding behind a screen name during the trial. All the witnesses in the case will fall under the wrath of the scales of justice. They will have to prove themselves to a court of law and not have someone there to defend every action behind some anonymous screen name on line.

The scales of Justice will prevail in proving the details of this case. If Harlow and Joe are innocent, then the scales will tip to their side and they will be freed. If they are guilty then the scales will tip to the side of Justice and may God have mercy on their souls.

If Sean and Grant are involved, the scales will once again tip to the side of their guilt and involvement in this case. They will not be able to hide behind the overwhelming response of the defenders they have on line. The same applies to any involvement that Robert or anyone else may have had in this case.

So as bloggers attempt to prove the point they are trying to make without any evidence or proof to back up what they say, the Scales of Justice are in place and ready to weigh the real evidence in a court of law. Regardless of what certain bloggers claim, the Scales of Justice will seek the truth in this case. Not opinion. This includes the opinion of the DA. He has formed his opinion and now it’s time to prove his opinion in a court of law. He thinks he has a clear version of what happened and why it happened; now we just have to wait and see what the Scales of Justice thinks about his opinion.

Some bloggers claim the on-line discussion of this case will taint the jury pool. First someone would have to prove in court that all of the potential jurors have read all the blogs and their opinions were tainted and they now have formed an opinion prior to trial. Either way, innocent or guilty, that potential juror would be stricken from the list and they move on to the next potential juror. These blog have done nothing but provide the opinion of a few people that post on a regular basis. Some claim there will be a change of venue. Unless the people have been overwhelmed in PA with the Mainstream media this will never happen. Some bloggers claim there is a consistent failure of mainstream media to provide coverage of this case and yet certain bloggers think it’s enough to call for a change of venue. I guess any case that ever makes the paper or makes it to a magazine article or discussed on line should be moved somewhere that there is no paper, no magazine and no internet to makes sure the accused receive a fair trial.

It’s also amazing following this case how people have twisted and spun the truth into what they want to believe regardless of the truth in this case.

Prime example just happened on another blog

6. Not the least of those differences may arise because Cuadra has reportedly already “provided information about the case,” presumably to the DA’s office. (The folks at HarlowCuadraOnline flatly deny this report.)

If people honestly think Harlow and Joe are guilty why do they need to twist and spin the facts into what they want to believe?

The article in the paper referred to the Public’s Defenders office representing both Harlow and Joe now. It is no secret that Bill Ruzzo was Harlow’s paid attorney until he became court appointed. It should also be obvious that Harlow has talked to his attorney since he has been in PA. By the way, if there was any talking to the DA there would not be an issue within the Public Defenders office with now representing both men. People have twisted and spun the truth once again into only what they elect to believe. Of course this was done in the name of providing the unbiased news and truth of this case.

People want cold hard fact, but yet they twist and spin the truth into the cold hard fact they want to believe.

Believe what you will. I believe this; the Scales of Justice stand ready to weigh the evidence and Justice will prevail in this case. I know we have problems within our legal system as a whole, but overall the System works the way it was designed to work. The Scales of Justice are only interested in the truth and what can be proven or disproved beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Claim what you will, but the evidence presented thus far has left reasonable doubt in my mind as to who is actually guilty in this case.